Spurious Trip Rate: 4 Smart Voting Choices to Avoid Losses

Share:
Safety Systems
Spurious Trip Rate: 4 Smart Voting Choices to Avoid Losses

A safety system that trips the plant for no real reason costs production, stresses equipment and teaches operators to distrust alarms. Measuring how often false shutdowns happen lets engineers balance safety against availability with real numbers.

MTTFS Safe Failures 2oo3 Voting Lost Production

Every safety instrumented function has two faces, protecting against hazards and avoiding needless shutdowns. This guide shows how false trip frequency is calculated and how voting changes it.

Hello everyone, today we are going to learn what the spurious trip rate of a safety function is, how MTTFS is calculated and how voting architectures raise or lower nuisance shutdowns.
spurious trip rate

What Is Spurious Trip Rate?

The spurious trip rate, or STR, is the expected frequency at which a safety instrumented function shuts down the process when no real demand exists, usually expressed per hour or per year. It is driven by safe failures of sensors, logic and valves, and it is the availability side of every SIF design.

Its inverse is the mean time to fail spuriously, MTTFS. A function with MTTFS of 50 years is expected to cause one false shutdown every 50 years on average.

Diagram of safe spurious failure rate contributions in a safety function
Image credit: exida

Safety and false trips pull in opposite directions. Adding channels that can each trip lowers the probability of failure on demand but raises nuisance shutdowns, as shown in voting architectures.

Why False Trips Matter

Lost Production
Hours or days of output lost per shutdown.
Restart Risk
Startups are among the most hazardous plant modes.
Equipment Stress
Thermal and pressure cycling of vessels and machines.
Bypass Temptation
Operators may bypass a function they distrust.

The last point is serious, since a bypassed function gives no protection at all. That is why IEC 61511 asks for a maximum acceptable false trip frequency in the specification, separate from the SIL target.

The safety system and control system also differ in this respect, see SIS and BPCS differences. Control faults cause upsets, while safety faults can cause full shutdowns.

4 Smart Voting Choices

1oo1

Single channel, STR ≈ λS.

Best for: simple, low cost duty
Baseline
1oo2

Either channel trips, STR ≈ 2λS.

Best for: best safety, double false trips
Safe
2oo2

Both must agree, STR ≈ 2λS² × MTTR.

Best for: very few false trips, weaker safety
Available
2oo3

Two of three agree, STR ≈ 6λS² × MTTR.

Best for: good safety and availability
Balanced

The 2oo3 scheme tolerates one safe failure without tripping, which is why it is favoured for large continuous units. Its logic is explained in 2oo3 voting logic.

MTTR in these formulas is the time to detect and repair the first failed channel. Fast repair keeps a second failure from lining up with the first.

Worked Examples from silsafe.net

silsafe.net shows a 1oo1 channel with a safe undetected failure rate of 0.000002 per hour, which gives an MTTFS of about 57.1 years. It also notes that 10 to 100 years per channel is typical acceptable guidance.

For 1oo2 sensors with diagnostics, the same source calculates a false trip rate of 0.0000028 per hour. That equals about one spurious trip every 41 years.

False Trip Formulas and MTTFS

MTTFS = 1 ÷ STR, in years = 1 ÷ (STR × 8760)
1oo1: STR ≈ λS   1oo2: STR ≈ 2λS
2oo2: STR ≈ 2λS² × MTTR   2oo3: STR ≈ 6λS² × MTTR

Example: λS = 0.000002 per hour, MTTR = 8 h
1oo1: 1 ÷ (0.000002 × 8760) = 57.1 years
1oo2: 28.5 years
2oo2: STR = 0.000000000064 per hour, about 1783676 years
2oo3: STR = 0.000000000192 per hour, about 594559 years

These simple forms ignore common cause safe failures, which in practice set a floor on the redundant results. Add a beta factor term before trusting very large MTTFS numbers.

MTTFS Calculator

MTTFS by Voting Architecture
Result
MTTFS 1oo1 57.1 years, 1oo2 28.5 years, 2oo2 1783675.8 years, 2oo3 594558.6 years

Treat the redundant figures as upper limits, since common cause effects usually dominate them. The single channel figures are most useful for comparing device choices.

Ways to Lower Nuisance Shutdowns

1
Pick Reliable Devices
Use certified field devices with low safe failure rates.
2
Use Diagnostics
Detected faults can alarm instead of tripping.
3
Choose 2oo3 Where Justified
Voting cuts false trips without losing safety.
4
Maintain Final Elements
Solenoids and actuators cause many false closures.
5
Filter Trip Signals
Short delays reject noise within process safety time.

Final elements are a frequent source of false trips, see SIS final element reliability. Diagnostics also raise the safe failure fraction.

Proof testing must be planned so tests themselves do not trip the plant, as discussed in proof test interval and coverage.

Benefits of Tracking STR
  • Quantifies availability alongside safety.
  • Justifies voting and device choices.
  • Reduces pressure to bypass functions.
  • Supports production cost decisions.
Limitations
  • Safe failure data is often less reliable.
  • Common cause is easy to overlook.
  • Process upsets are not included.
  • Simple formulas assume fast repair.

Both the false trip figure and PFDavg should be checked in SIL verification. The broader picture of hazards and systems is compared in process safety vs functional safety.

Deriving Trip Formulae PDF

PDF
Deriving Spurious Trip Rate Formulae
Dr Fan Ye, IChemE HAZARDS 30 paper

Unit MTTFS Video

Spurious Trip Rate FAQ

What is spurious trip rate?
It is how often a safety function shuts down the process without a real demand. It is usually quoted per hour or converted into years between false trips.
What is MTTFS?
MTTFS is the mean time to fail spuriously, equal to one divided by the false trip rate. A larger value means fewer nuisance shutdowns.
Why does 1oo2 double false trips?
Either of the two channels can trip the plant on its own. Two channels therefore give roughly twice the safe failure rate of one.
Why is 2oo3 popular?
It tolerates one failed channel in either direction without losing safety or tripping. It gives a good balance of protection and plant availability.
What MTTFS is acceptable?
silsafe.net cites 10 to 100 years per channel as typical guidance. The final target should come from production loss and restart risk.
Does IEC 61511 require a false trip target?
The standard asks for the maximum acceptable spurious trip frequency in the safety requirements. It is set separately from the SIL target.
How can nuisance trips be reduced?
Use reliable devices, diagnostics, suitable voting and good maintenance of final elements. Signal filtering can help when the process safety time allows it.

Related Articles

External References

What We Learn Today

  • Spurious trip rate measures false shutdowns, and MTTFS is its inverse.
  • 1oo2 doubles false trips while 2oo2 and 2oo3 reduce them.
  • Diagnostics, device choice and maintenance keep nuisance trips low.
I hope you like above blog. There is no cost associated in sharing the article in your social media. Thanks for reading!! Happy Learning!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *